The ZSB Apprenticeship is named after Chryslers’ “Three Musketeers” engineering team and focuses on the path, desires and expertise in hopes of reaching the teams level of innovation. The “Three Musketeers’” drive for ambitious achievements in the automotive industry and my personal connection to Fred M. Zeder’s own drive and devolution through his daughter, my Grandmother and the spirit to understand, design and create has emerged in my own work in a way that is best described as an apprenticeship.
ZSB 6 set the stage for how I as the Quixote attempted to reconcile the inabilities I have in explaining what I learned from my family’s prestigious history. Uniquely designed furniture pieces, sculptures, paintings, drawings, prints and hand crafted wallpaper serves as a legend to understand the rest of the Apprenticeship series. The second part of the Apprenticeship series ZSB 3 is the process an apprentice takes in learning and developing a skill. This set represents the Quixote’s advancement, it contains still life drawings with the process still apart of the image, rubbings of printing blocks discovering a form of image making, and woodblock prints emulating strategic plans.
The ZSB Apprenticeship intertwines esoteric symbols, hierarchies, patterns, historical and pop culture references, not in the vein of an illogical fool, but one who creates a new logic from what is inside him. “A Quixote’s Apprenticeship towards ZSB” continues for why and how the world needs to be constructed so that he may understand and so he will be understood.
One of the things that strikes me in your work is a tension between two different types of worth - two different ways to measure oneself. First, there is the internally-driven striving for greatness - the innovation and craft that's exemplified by the ZSB Chrysler engineering team. This ideal is historically very American - the self-made person who is creating his/her identity through ambition and achievement. This contrasts with the externally-imposed status symbols of Prada and other European designer names - measures not of any internal drive but of wealth which may or may not be earned.
Here are some questions I think you'll need to grapple with as you continue this project. To really understand the project, viewers need to know a fair amount of background and context - how are you going to convey the backstory to the viewers? Over time, can you incorporate more of your concept into the work itself so as to be less reliant on the artist statement? (This is something I think most artists struggle with!) What will be the scope of the project? I could see this as an intimate dialogue between yourself and your great-grandfather, or it could grow to encompass more of your family tree, becoming one of those multi-generational family sagas.
Another challenge is that the designer names such as Prada are so laden with meaning in our culture, and I'm not sure it's always the meaning you intend. I project a multitude of associations onto these - the frivolity of celebrities who collect a $20,000 handbag in every color of the rainbow; young status-seekers who rack up credit card debt on designer items they can't afford. Your intent in using these symbols is a bit too vague for me. It's always a fine line between being too heavy-handed vs. too vague, but in this case the ambiguousness is distracting and I could use a bit more direction in how I should relate to these symbols.
In terms of the craft itself - I find the rubbings very beautiful but the woodcarvings/drawings intrigue me more because when your hand is present, you are forced to come to terms with your own skill level and how that measures up to the ideal you have of your great-grandfather (and surrogate grandfathers like the renaissance painters). I would like to see the drawings become more complex/challenging - maybe taking a subject like the intricate inner gears and engines of the automobile, or doing a drawing that's actually the size of a 1920's car. Or perhaps a subject that's not related literally to cars, but that has a level of intricacy or challenging spatial relations that will push the drawing further into the realm of your heroes.
Wow, Very nice elaborate and forthcoming in your assessment. There are good points brought up. One point that I had already started thinking about is that of craft, and how one comes to term with his own skill, to accept where they fall short and to start building that muscle so he becomes a better craftsman, painter, arts, etc. For so long I put off it dealing with my skill issues directly and now it is my plan to openly start dealing with it. Now my question is; how does one show the open investigation of skill in the work?That is my overall quest for this new series.
ReplyDeleteThe second is How do I incorporate these brands possibly logos without having them become the main focus or rather the only focus, to have people seeing them not as a component to the larger concept? I think my visual exploration of this is found in some of the rubbings where I start to incorporate different logos within the surrounding patterns. This approach may start to become slightly successfully at having the logos still be apart of the work by carry weight as a part of the drawing first and the high-end logo second, or at least that is what I am working towards.
With these two points being the forethought of my current work it does not mean that the other questions you raised have fall away and have no importance. It simply is that these two dilemmas within my work are currently at the front of my mind and carry the most weight in my though process.
Thank you again this means a lot, and I hope this gets some good discussion!
Hi Andrew,
ReplyDeleteThis is my first look at your work in a few years. The first words that popped into head are "loved", "honored", "commemorative", "feminine", and "delicate".
By composing the first two as decorative vignettes on wooden plaques, I have to wonder why these line drawings of heavy, imposing, industrial things are given such a tender treatment. Is it meant to question notions of gender? At first, I felt that such an analysis was supported by the soft, pretty, colors and lacy patterns of the four rubbings.
The one with "PRADA" in the composition give me something to chew on, that I'm not sure I like the flavor of, though it sticks with me the most. The word is framed in a composition that seems to flutter with the artist's gesture. It resembles something one would see in nature, like a grouping of flowers or islands. "PRADA" gives it the sinister element of something that the devil wears. I feel skeptical of it, like it's trying to use the cachet of a name brand to appeal to rich people, or wannabe rich people.
I find that your Artist's Statement to be integral to understanding where your coming from conceptually. Without knowing anything about Chrysler or your family history, I may have never guessed how truly personal this work is, or how it grapples with concerns that many people have about the country, world, or culture we happen to inherit.